The institution of preventive measures in the domestic criminal process is primarily directly related to the effectiveness of the investigation and suppression of crimes.Within the framework of the general trend of humanization, measures of house arrest and the prohibition of certain actions play a special role, as a result of which the problems arising from their application are relevant and significant for the researcher.The main purpose of this work was to study the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural coercion, in particular house caruso milk thistle arrest and prohibition of certain actions.In the development of this goal, the problems of crediting the period of being under the ban of certain actions related to isolation from society in favor of the execution of punishment were considered.The positions frequently found in the doctrine about the absence of a difference in the content of house arrest and the prohibition of certain actions were also analyzed.
General scientific method s of cognition (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction), the formal legal method were used in the work, a retrospective analysis of the emergence and changes of legal institutions was carried out.According to the results of the work, it was found that the simultaneous existence in the Russian criminal procedure law of preventive measures in the form of a ban on certain actions and house arrest is explained by their differences in legal nature.It was also found that the legal construction of Article getpureroutine.com 72 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not meet the principle of legal certainty in the part in which it does not provide for a direct indication of the offset of the period of stay under the ban of certain actions related to isolation from society in favor of the execution of punishment, which is why law enforcement practice in such cases is forced to use the provisions of this article by analogy in the systemic interpretation with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.At the same time, the existing rules for setting off the period of being under house arrest and under the specified prohibitions in favor of detention do not meet the principle of fairness, which is why the authors proposed their own concept to solve the problem.